I'd love for @Apple to explain why it doesn't tell consumers #AirPod replacements are "non-refundable." jeffersongraham.substack.com…
3
4
Replying to @jeffersongraham @Apple
(Not an attorney) Under California law, it has to be “posted conspicuously” otherwise “as long as you have your receipt, you are entitled to full refund or equal exchange within 7 days of purchase. (Cal. Civil Code § 1723.)” saclaw.org/articles/returns-…

May 8, 2021 · 11:45 PM UTC

1
Replying to @bilcorry @Apple
27th clause of Apple.com's legal policy online spells out that it won't accept returns on "service" orders, which is how Apple characterizes buying replacement parts.
1
When ordering, does it say it’s a service order? And is having it buried within a dense legal agreement considered “posted conspicuously”?