I’m curious to know more about the marginalization issues. For me, harm reduction speaks to reducing risk of harm for decisions made by individuals. Safety by Design instead focuses on reducing harm at product design. Eg putting tape over a laptop camera vs physical off switch.
Maybe we can get @tweetinjules to talk about the framework at the to-be-named Safety by Design conference. And perhaps @Arm + @simonsegars would be willing to sponsor, as a leader in the IoT space.
You should check out the awesome work of Australia’s eSafety Commissioner (@tweetinjules), including tech facilitated abuse, image-based abuse, safety by design, smart devices, etc.
esafety.gov.au
Once upon a time, I owned the bug bounty program at @PayPal. There was never a "savings" in terms of head count nor cost. Bug bounties require effort, even if you outsource to one of the BB platforms, and should never be a substitute for internal assessments.
Ross Ulbricht would suggest adding the capability to lock when the laptop is unplugged, your face moves away from the camera, you shout “feds!”, or a USB device is inserted without unlocking the USB ports first.