W3C Verifiable Credentials are better than JOSE because they support decentralization and semantic interoperability, in addition to digital signatures over JSON.
1
12
GIF
I view those as orthogonal requirements and honestly, it’s my biggest reservation that I need to accept the ‘whole package.’
2
4
@trbouma Are you wanting to verify things that are more in the scope of private namespaces? JSON-LD and Semantic Interoperability is vital to the success of the knowledge of what’s being verified. Hence the Knowledge Graph.
2
2
Two separate problems. Problem 1 is about intention of the actors. Problem 2 is about semantics of the information. I’m not discounting either, but if we are to work at global scale, they need to be solved as independent problems,
2
4
JOSE supports authenticity and intention, and is used to power most consumer and enterprise identity. 44% of all websites rely on JSON-LD. Both problems have been solved independently. W3C Verifiable Credentials leverage the best solutions for both problems.
2
1
2
yeah my point stands. The vast majority of publishers publishing JSON-LD on their websites for Google to consume care approximately 0% about the LD part of the JSON-LD, and frankly care about 1% about the JSON part. They just want Google to read the website.
Nov 5, 2022 · 11:34 PM UTC
1
5



