Yes! All the constructs we interact with online exist to perform a service, the info about us they need changes accordingly and in many cases β€œidentity” isn’t necessary. The twin metaphor miiight work, but is problematic when considering laws 2 and 4
Andrew Nash @winemaker
21 Jun 2022
I am happy to present verified credentials about me - if anything the outcome is that you dont have to know who I am - I certainly do not want a cradle to grave digital identity #identiverse
1
2
It appears we have lost the value of the separation of the digital vs real me - me at Home, at Work, in my Gaming Community and many more I want to keep separate - sharing just my attributes should support this #identiverse
1
2
Replying to @winemaker @vibronet
Yeah I heard that and was like 😬😬😬😬😬😬😬🚩

Jun 21, 2022 Β· 8:41 PM UTC

1
1
Replying to @aaronpk @winemaker @vibronet
To be fair, we’re not considering whether the one digital twin can be used as the basis for creating personas - a not new concept that can manifest itself within the verifiable credentials model of operations. The problem is that managing digital personas is exhausting.
2
It’s all very tricky. Assuming that you can mint personas from that one twins implies those have non-empty intersections, which might or might not be desirable. And, to your point, the management burden acquired new dimensions.
1