Ō̴̡̨͍͕̠̹̘͖͓̭̝̰̖͉̬̫͍̝̰̟͖͖̞͇̟̻̫͇̠̯̋̋̂ͅͅA̷̡̧͎̫̬͖̠͍̼̗̠͊̉̏̓̈́̂̀̈́͆͘͜uth @oktadev oauth.wtf oauth.net 🎥 livestreaming youtube.com/aaronpk aaronpk.tv 💛 #indieweb 🐘🦋

Portland, Oregon
Joined April 2008
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Ohh I think my old ones do that too!
1
Replying to @obra
Been there. Frantically hoping it downloads on my spotty cell service from the runway.
My summer go-to is a Negroni (gin, campari, vermouth, bitters), winter is Boulevardier season (bourbon, campari, vermouth, bitters). Can you tell I like Campari?
1
now you're speaking my language!
1
2
Replying to @Johannes_Ernst
to be fair I don't label any of mine anyway
Replying to @benwerd
Wait what's a post-it printer? Is it smol and cute if so I must have one
1
Replying to @anderspitman
While that sounds nice in theory, the real world is more complicated. Apple's OAuth server is a great example. User IDs are scoped to the app to prevent cross correlation, and the app gets a proxy email instead of the user's real email. Users don't always want to be identified.
1
Replying to @anderspitman
I was trying to say feel free to pick and choose and use just the client ID part. I think that'd be a huge benefit for OAuth as a whole for the exact kind of use case you're talking about.
1
Replying to @anderspitman
Doesn't have to be a top level domain, just a URL. Both users and apps are identified by URLs. I do think there's value in just client IDs being URLs in some cases, demonstrated by the fact that Home Assistant picked out just that part of the spec for their OAuth API.
2
I like to think of myself as a somewhat organized person. But all these SD cards have photos and videos from different trips and projects and cameras, in no particular order, and I really need to sort out what has already been backed up and what exists only on the cards.
3
3
Replying to @anderspitman
You're not wrong. You may want to give this a read, which addresses that exact problem: aaronparecki.com/2018/07/07/… We use this a lot for the case you're talking about, where app developers have no relationship with the OAuth service the app is talking to.
1
Microformats != Microdata microformats.io tbh I also can't stand the itemprop= itemscope= stuff, it's so messy. That's why I like the Microformats approach instead.
Like I said already, only if you care about SEO. If SEO is your goal, you do what Google says. There's plenty of uses of structured data outside of that (including the tools that I use to read and post to Twitter) which are easier done using Microformats
2
3
Literally on schema.org... "Founded by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Yandex..." and look at the names on their about page too. Even if it's not created exclusively by them (which I never said), that looks an awful lot like an oligopoly to me anyway.
1
Frankly "linked data" is not a priority for me. There's plenty of useful structured data that is not LD, and tbh most developers who use JSON-LD don't even know about the LD part, they just copy the examples and wonder why they have "@context" everywhere
Yes, read the linked post, it's from 2016
1
You might be surprised what you can do with Microformats... aaronparecki.com/2018/03/12/… Even this tweet originated from my own website using tools built on Microformats.
1
2
2
Replying to @kmikeym
the guy that runs your website must be really good
1