There is no such thing as pre-1967 borders, the term is meaningless. Those were armistice lines, and they were explicitly not borders, they were just lines where armies stopped advancing.
Ask Around @yothisissomeguy
Dec 5
Replying to @TheOmniLiberal
The majority of the world acknowledges Palestine. Basically the entire world agrees with the pre-1967 borders. Put down the Zionist pipe. You've lost it.
122
93
14
1,718
Replying to @TheOmniLiberal
Would you say that the Korean border is not a border?

Dec 5, 2023 · 7:44 PM UTC

17
5
1
191
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
It's an armistice line, war hasn't actually ended
1
15
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
They're officially still at war
12
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
Yes, it is absolutely not a border.
5
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
The comparison also isn't even applicable here - the equivalent would be if North Korea invaded South Korea again, South Korea won and retook the entire North, and then the North Koreans demanded that things go back to the way they were before they invaded.
1
1
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
It’s not.
3
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
I hate it when my dads fight please stop
5
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
It's not technically a border as they're still at war. It's a demilitarised zone so they can't fight each other as they would have to cross that zone. Please learn basic history before making some point like this.
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
Well it is armistice line
3
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
It literally isn't
1
5
Replying to @XJosh @TheOmniLiberal
Will Josh learn what an armistice is today?
1
8
Load more