In his first veto, Biden just sided with woke Wall Street over workers. Tells you exactly where his priorities lie. Now—despite a bipartisan vote to block his ESG agenda—it’s clear Biden wants Wall Street to use your retirement savings to fund his far-left political causes.

Mar 20, 2023 · 5:46 PM UTC

9,236
11,532
993
38,937
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
Nah, I would say Biden sided with Wall Street AND workers and the youth and future of our country, and that the @GOP is only approaching this from the perspective of their fossil fuel pimps, not concerned about workers at all.
9
43
329
Do you know how many green / eco friendly start ups looked good to invest in (obama & solar as an example) big monies invested & so many flopped & took all investment money with them. Their CEO's etc got millions. It would be frightening if the gov required a certain percentage of all retirement investments to be green/eco programs. That could be a next step in this presidents agenda.
1
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
Woke Wall Street? Get a grip.
7
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
The Republican-led bill would force retirement managers to ignore these relevant risk factors, disregarding the principles of free markets and jeopardizing the life savings of working families and retirees
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK KEVIN.
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
Override to show GOP isn’t just bluffing.
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
Learn to read the laws. 20 for rape just like murder has no statue of limitations. They did change the statue on Rape as well to no limitations. Like murder. Because both attack the physical body.
1
So once again if there was no crime committed against Stormy then why pay her to stay silent? And that is a criminal offense to cover a violent crime. I wonder what that means?
Replying to @SpeakerMcCarthy
Or the actual truth is you can choose where your retirement funds go and they don't have to go to anything you don't want them to. Try an index fund, they're great. But any chance to throw the word woke in there to rile up your base while actually doing nothing for America.
3
7
120
Your point is good, but... We all can move our money to funds with investment criteria we like. Except we can't. Some are trapped into retirement accounts where the options are not there except for ESG. 401K and the like. Yes, employers should widen the list of choices. When they don't, what is the option? I agree anyone can just cancel their 401K to avoid ESG, but that shouldn't be necessary.
3
1
4