The Senate has an obligation to fully vet all nominees to ensure they meet the highest ethical standards. Ms. Raskin repeatedly failed to provide clear & comprehensive responses to @BankingGOP’s questions. Until she does, the committee shouldn't proceed w/ a vote on Ms. Raskin.

Feb 15, 2022 · 6:57 PM UTC

109
58
11
482
Load newest
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
I highly doubt this, Tim. It’s because Jamie Raskin was the manager for impeachment 2, and y’all can’t get over it. Sad.
1
4
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
The GOP Senators also have an obligation to attend their committee meetings. Where were you & GOP colleagues yesterday?
1
3
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
You appeared to be a no-show along with all the other GOP members. Kind of seems like the cowards way. You really need to show up for your job when drawing a tax payer salary.
1
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
Oh Tim hush. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @All100Senators @BankingGOP
And you were absolutely fine with everybody trump nominated? Wow, he must only have picked the best candidates!
3
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
Shame on you and your gop senators for not showing up for the vote. People in SC are hurting with this inflation & ya'll want to make it worse. I will do my best to spread the word to never give you another vote again.
2
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
We just proceed without any response for Republicans' SCOTUS nominees, eh?
1
2
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
Senators have an obligation to SHOW UP! How come the entire GOP failed to show up at the Banking and Housing Committee meeting? Do you think that’s how you are supposed to represent me in the senate? Vote NO on Tim Scott.
1
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @BankingGOP
Wonder if the GOP vetted you. Probably stopped at "effs over his people" ✅ #AmirLocke
1
2
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @All100Senators @BankingGOP
2
5
Load more