If President Trump was such an existential threat, why did Speaker Pelosi rush the impeachment only to wait twelve days to send the article to the Senate? (2/5)
117
20
20
169
If the purpose of this trial is to remove a president, that was already done on January 20th when President Trump left the White House. (3/5)
54
11
6
132
But now, once again, the Senate is faced with the time-consuming task of determining the merits of yet another Article of Impeachment on now former President Trump. (4/5)
59
25
7
328
We need to get back to the people’s work. We need to get vaccines distributed, save small businesses, safely re-open schools, and get our economy back on track—I’m here to do that. Anything other than that is simply a distraction. (5/5)
198
54
14
688
Load newest
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
So you agree, as long as presidents commit high crimes and abuses of their power, at the END of their term, it’s okey dokey?
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Well you wouldn't be. You'd be holding a trial for an impeached President, who was impeached during his term.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
0
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Do your "thoughts" include Officer Sicknick?
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Nazi
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
He is not a private citizen. He is a former POTUS who is guilty of insurrection
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
GIF
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Coward.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
"former" official is ACTUALLY LITERALLY WRITTEN in the law
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Clinton was a private citizen. How many years did gop investigate Bengazi?
Load more