If President Trump was such an existential threat, why did Speaker Pelosi rush the impeachment only to wait twelve days to send the article to the Senate? (2/5)
117
20
20
170
If the purpose of this trial is to remove a president, that was already done on January 20th when President Trump left the White House. (3/5)
54
11
6
132
But now, once again, the Senate is faced with the time-consuming task of determining the merits of yet another Article of Impeachment on now former President Trump. (4/5)
59
25
7
328
We need to get back to the people’s work. We need to get vaccines distributed, save small businesses, safely re-open schools, and get our economy back on track—I’m here to do that. Anything other than that is simply a distraction. (5/5)
198
54
14
688
Load newest
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
You are wrong
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
How convenient.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
GIF
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Purpose of the trial is to hold him accountable for trying to overturn the votes of millions of Americans. And when he couldn’t, he incited a riot while still president.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Are you familiar with the legal concept of "precedent"?
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
So, why didn't you hold the trial before he left office. When the party splits will you chose Trumpism or conservatism?
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Senator, many reputable conservative voices have said it is constitutional. Hold him accountable for his actions. Show him actions have consequences. He must be prevented from attempting to come back to office, further divide our country and undermine the GOP.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
There is precedent. The end.
Load more