If President Trump was such an existential threat, why did Speaker Pelosi rush the impeachment only to wait twelve days to send the article to the Senate? (2/5)
117
20
20
170
If the purpose of this trial is to remove a president, that was already done on January 20th when President Trump left the White House. (3/5)
54
11
6
132
But now, once again, the Senate is faced with the time-consuming task of determining the merits of yet another Article of Impeachment on now former President Trump. (4/5)
59
25
7
328
We need to get back to the people’s work. We need to get vaccines distributed, save small businesses, safely re-open schools, and get our economy back on track—I’m here to do that. Anything other than that is simply a distraction. (5/5)
198
54
14
688
Load newest
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
I see lots of excuses, but no commitment to the Constitution nor the rule of law.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Does #sedition matter or not? What would be your stance if it were a Democratic president who had incited #insurrection???
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
I am so disappointed to hear this is your position.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
nitter.vloup.ch/CaslerNoel/statu… Private citizen my ass!
This tweet is unavailable
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
He was not a private citizen when this happened and he needs to be held accountable... do you think he would have your back like you are trying to cover for him?
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Only one man died trying to defend us? Ok let’s move on.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
But it wasn't Too late to hold hearings and confirmed the last supreme court justice!
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
I don’t believe fur a moment you really think that. This is grotesque. It’s an invitation for presidents to violate the law as their end of term nears. Out of touch with precedent and what the Constitution says.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
GIF
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
First, the House needs to actually come to work; 2) Nancy said that it was so he can’t run again in 2024.
Load more