If President Trump was such an existential threat, why did Speaker Pelosi rush the impeachment only to wait twelve days to send the article to the Senate? (2/5)
117
20
20
170
If the purpose of this trial is to remove a president, that was already done on January 20th when President Trump left the White House. (3/5)
54
11
6
132
But now, once again, the Senate is faced with the time-consuming task of determining the merits of yet another Article of Impeachment on now former President Trump. (4/5)
59
25
7
328
We need to get back to the people’s work. We need to get vaccines distributed, save small businesses, safely re-open schools, and get our economy back on track—I’m here to do that. Anything other than that is simply a distraction. (5/5)
198
54
14
688
Load newest
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
The only difference between you and Trump is skin color and age. What he did didn't change just because he was voted out of office--or you think those who died will come back to life since he left office. The trial beginning February 8 is not unprecedented.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
My thoughts as a voter in SC's Fifth District: This is the second stage of the impeachment process. Incite an insurrection, you get impeached, then the Senate takes up the matter. Can we get @staceyabrams to move to SC before 2022?
1
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
A vote AGAINST impeaching Trump is a vote FOR the insurrection at the Capitol led by Trump. Remember your oath to defend our Constituition. Honor the death of Brian Sicknick, a military veteran and experienced Capitol Police officer.
1
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Great so have the DOJ arrest him as a private citizen for trying to overthrow the government
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
GIF
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Basic facts and precedent suggest otherwise.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott
Shorter version: I'm a goddam amoral coward. There, saves you typing for next time.
Replying to @SenatorTimScott @RepHuizenga
nitter.vloup.ch/QuinHillyer/stat…
Load more