.@jasonintrator on his observation, in Kyiv, that some on the left view Ukraine as a fascist state:
“In this case, we must recognize the left condemns imperialism, whether it’s by the United States or by any other country.”
Polling from the Washington Post shows Republican voters have a higher approval rating of Putin than they do of Biden.
“There is a utility to Right-wing media,” says @pastpunditry. “All of the incentives are there for the Right to continue to have propaganda networks.”
Why are prominent figures across U.S. right-wing media doubling down on support for Putin as he’s launching an invasion of Ukraine?
“Now that they’ve embraced total moral bankruptcy, what more do they have to give?” asks @mehdirhasan.
NEW: Pres. Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he will stay in Kyiv amid a Russian invasion.
“I think he’s doing it at personal risk because if the Russians do go into Kyiv,” says @steven_pifer, “they’re definitely about regime change and he would be #1 on the list.”
In a rambling war declaration Thursday morning, Vladimir Putin threw everything at the wall in hopes something might stick.
But “denazification”? That is pure Putinesque projection, @mehdirhasan says…
And he brought receipts.
In his invasion announcement Thursday morning, Putin claimed that the "de-nazification" of Ukraine was a justification for military action. But last night, Yale historian @TimothyDSnyder made clear why such claims are baseless.
Some financial analysts have likened ousting Russia from SWIFT as a "nuclear option," saying it would be an unprecedented move against one of the world's largest economies.
More on the banking system and how Russia's removal would affect the country: on.msnbc.com/3vdU3FW
What would you do if you were a Supreme Court justice and your wife had a political or financial interest in your case? It’s happened more than once to Justice Clarence Thomas.
So why hasn’t he recused himself from those cases?
What is “maskirovka”?
Historian @TimothyDSnyder explains why he’s concerned about what Putin is saying… and then lays out how an old Soviet-era strategy of deception can help explain what Putin is thinking:
A message to the far-right in America, from @mehdirhasan:
“It is entirely possible to be skeptical of U.S. intervention, to criticize NATO and Western imperialism in good faith without becoming a de facto spokesman for Vladimir Putin.”