Banning TikTok is a national security need, not a threat to First Amendment freedoms, says @jamil_n_jaffer: "We're talking about dance videos and the like." But @JameelJaffer tells @mehdirhasan that banning the platform has much more crucial consequences.

Jun 1, 2023 · 5:17 PM UTC

8
9
10
47
0
Greatly underestimating what tech you don't know about. That data's just a building block. The 5th/6th gen. tech interfaces with the human body. It doesn't just attack your router or get your bank acct numbers from apps. It can cause you perm. brain damage/human enslavement.
But, my rights! When somebody's shooting at you? Really? Ok, then, please stand up!
Banning China means hammering China ... And hammering China means hammering Pakistan.... And what's the problem in that , they deserve every bit of the hammering isn't it ? Learn to give a complete picture Mehdi Hasan!
A residential building collapsed in davenport Iowa. I've heard more about that on tik tok, than any other news source. This isn't about China, this is about not being able to control the narrative.
4
Jamil vs Jameel debate was great. Can you do @MattGertz vs Matt Gaetz next?
2
Banning the most popular social media platform for people in their 20's and under isn't a threat to the First Amendment? I don't see how such an argument is credible.
2
TikTok is very popular with young people, many of whom vote. I'm wondering...
2
"dance videos and the like" are now a national security threat.