NYT journalist Maggie Haberman's new Trump book is stacked with revelations — and it's caused a stir over the ethics of reporters holding onto key information for their books. Catch more of @mehdirhasan's convo w/ @SteveSchmidtSES and @speechboy71 on @MSNBConPeacock.

Oct 6, 2022 · 8:19 PM UTC

53
223
16
663
0
I’m in agreement w/Steve Schmidt. Hell, I’m always in agreement with him. No idea why anyone would not be in agreement with him. 💙🇺🇸🗳
1
2
Conflict of interest barely scrapes the surface of these grifting journalist ‘authors’. T H I S is not a game. These folks are not patriots, not showing respect to their fellow Americans who have had just about all they can take.
2
Haberman is front & Center as her’s is the most recent example. Bob Woodward had audio recording of trump admitting he knew how deadly Covid was going to be & sat on that info for 6 months, while trump held daily briefings saying the exact opposite. It’s an institutional failure.
3
11
And then reporters have to read the damn book to report on revelations. This is not journalism.
6
While the New York times has put out a lot of stories on Trump during the Trump presidency,, This one book is not the only one where this question has come up!
1
I've been using "commodify" when I meant "commoditize" for decades. Thanks and gratitude to all who preserved my feelings by not correcting me.
A stir but is there even one reporter who has put her on the spot about this?
1
3