.@importantmeagan: "The difference between this country and other countries is there are so many guns. There’s so, so many guns. And today, the Supreme Court just kind of said, ‘We don’t care.’”

Jun 24, 2022 · 12:07 AM UTC

14
91
6
279
0
Well, yeah. Because the Supreme Court is supposed to care about the UNITED STATES Constitution ... not having a seat at the international "cool table."
.@importantmeagan: "The difference between this country and other countries is there are so many guns. There’s so, so many guns. And today, the Supreme Court just kind of said, ‘We don’t care.’”
FK the “supreme” court. 🔥🤬🤡👎🏽💩🗑 @SCOTUSblog @POTUS
Effectively they want no impediments when it comes to guns on the streets. At the same time they wish to ban abortions; purportedly to save lives. Where is the irony in that.
1
3
Why aren’t you on @MSNBC ? You’re better than most of the republicans on there.
Hypothetical: Could the 6 want a violent conflict? Why would they do this? Why this carve out or two step?
Why am I so sure the radical right-wing majority of the Roberts Court would care a whole damn lot if ten thousand black men with legally purchased AR-15s exercised their constitutionally-protected 2nd Amendment right to public carry on the streets where THEY live?
3
2
If the Supremes are looking to the intentions of the founders regarding guns, they should say it's fine to carry guns anywhere - but only late 18th century guns. The kind that can fire a few shots and then have a cumbersome reloading process.
Just so depressing 😡
1