An individual right to self-defense with a gun isn’t actually provided by the Second Amendment, @ElieNYC argues. Its original purpose was to preserve white supremacy and slavery. You’re going to want to hear him explain it:

Jun 2, 2022 · 12:06 AM UTC

1,260
725
300
1,933
0
Load newest
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
Interpretation is subjective, we are influenced by our own world views and information we have about a particular issue. Backgrounds play an integrated part in our thoughts and processing of written words is personal.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @AmoneyResists @ElieNYC
There's #merica !
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @KayKosmos @ElieNYC
Aghast.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @KayKosmos @ElieNYC
This makes absolute sense. Truth.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
youtube.com/watch?v=MKrFQV…
1
4
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
Sweeden has a malitia and everyone is armed according and heavly regulated because they are to be called to act if attacked. But if you are in a malitia. If you are in a MALITIA this man is your ultimate commander.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
It's settled law. Learn to cope.
3
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
When the first part of the tweet ended “isn’t actually provided by second amendment” I thought interesting, probably a historical or legal nuance here. But then it ends with “white supremacy and slavery” a run of the mill msnbc take on everything, so nothing interesting
3
133
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
The propaganda is strong in this one.
2
2
180
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @ElieNYC
Nope
Load more