NEWSFLASH: Nowhere in the Constitution does it stipulate the number of justices who are meant to serve on the Supreme Court at a given time. @MehdiRHasan makes the case for rebalancing the Court. WATCH:

May 16, 2022 · 12:30 AM UTC

14
109
8
344
0
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
Please have a look in the situation in Pakistan. Its really important moments for People of Pakistan
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
Democrats should emphasize that increased control of Congress will enable: •Ending the filibuster •Expanding SCOTUS •Gun control •Lower prescription cost •Child tax credits •Voter rights law •Abortion rights law •Tax reform •Domestic terrorism law
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @AmoneyResists @mehdirhasan
That's right, but if you want to play the game, wait til we nominate 40 / day when we have the majority.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
McConnell already packed it even though nowhere in the Constitution does it say that he could do that.
2
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
@ElieNYC is down for adding 20+ judges with 18 year term limits. He’s right.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the Republicans couldn't vote to not count the electoral votes for Biden on 1/6. It doesn't mean we should destroy the American institutions for partisan victories. If people don't wake up, the American experiment is about to end.
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
Just set term limits
1
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
YES!
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow @mehdirhasan
Fear of further diluting white male control...
Load more