Is there an underlying crime in the John Durham filing? @BarbMcQuade lays it out:

Feb 15, 2022 · 1:17 AM UTC

19
136
17
406
0
That‘s “Bull” Durham!J ust one more in a long line of inferior lawyers trying to be Trump’s Roy Cohn. Even Steve Bannon eyes Durham with suspicion!🥴
2
This is simply political chaff, tossed into the right-wing media ecosystem to distract their gullible followers from the bigger news of Trump's fraudulent accounting.
1
1\2 So no "Barb" doesn't lay it out. Yes the firm was hired to maintain the servers but covertly mined & took proprietary & conf data & disclosed it to 3rd parties, Georgia Tech & Clinton Campaign lawyers to hopefully turn up dirt on Trump including this debunked Alfa Bank theory
3
3
She certainly is benighted Mehdi I'm impressed where do you find this person? She makes up new charges out of whole cloth on the notion that if there was a crime it would already be charged. When there's obviously so much more. "Tech work for the White House?" I'm sorry what?
1
Why is he so quick to say this and this crime are punishable by death?? For someone covered with 5 layers of unlawful acts!!
Apparently not:
Interesting exchange here. Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer wonders if the Durham filing's mention of "infiltrate" means there was "hacking" of computers, only for John Ratcliffe to admit that this was actually "lawful access into government servers" by the tech company involved.