Did Covid-19 originate in a lab or in nature? Jury’s still out, apparently. @angie_rasmussen says the evidence points to nature, while @Ayjchan says “the current evidence is all circumstantial, and it is consistent with both a natural and a lab origin.”

Jun 3, 2021 · 11:41 PM UTC

37
39
16
113
0
Rasmussen just tried to tell us that a virus that had been meddled with in a lab will not continue to evolve. What?
2
You’ve invited the wrong speaker, why not inviting @DrLiMengYAN1 who revealed in early 2020 that Covid is a lab made bioweapon?
2
1
0
Replying to @MehdiHasanShow
@angie_rasmussen doesn't rule out lab spillover but says the virus couldn't have been engineered because it was not deadly enough and continues to evolve while @Ayjchan says to consider all the possibilities. I prefer Alina's take than it's not a perfect virus.
1
2
The clip cuts out right when you're about to let Alina Chan speak...
1
2
Chan's claim that they searched for more than a year for an animal host is disingenuous. It's a gigantic "so what?"
2
1
1
Circumstantial evidence (CE) can easily be as good, sometimes better, than direct evidence. A DNA test is excellent CE. Fingerprints are good CE. Ballistic analyses are excellent CE. There is no CE for the a leak of that quality. The CE for natural origin is much better. Not =.
1
2
Alina Chan has suggested members of the internet sleuths participate in Biden's 90-day reinvestigation of the origin of SARS-CoV-2. She seemed to be suggesting they should guide the investigation. If true, she does not believe in fully independent investigations.
1
Seriously, why does "I could have created a better bio weapon than this" still count as evidence for nature theory? Most of the research in lab is not to create bio weapon but gain of function/recombination of virus RNA. The current virus shared crucial portion with both bat and
1
1
2