1) if true, then how would anyone get a content ID claim for UT and DR, and why would you take responsibility for such? (e.g., why wouldn't your FAQ say, "it's not us claiming, because *we cannot*") 2) given that you do have claims, that doesn't explain why no revshare

Nice questions. It's a generalization, so how about "Indie composers who retained the copyrights to their sound recording and music publishing copyrights CANNOT deliver their soundtracks to Content ID via an MCN or distributor and WILL NOT get paid by YouTube."

1. (a.) Because cover songs. Distributors deliver metadata to YouTube, PROs deliver to YouTube. Each party wants its share for a recording. Here's a partial metadata sheet that PROs have provided for a popular MEGALOVANIA cover. Materia is the only display party.

1. (b.) bad actors. We have resolved 100+ cases of people reuploading original UNDERTALE music as theirs. That metadata stays in the system, and takes years to purge.

2. Materia Music Publishing only collects music publishing (sync/perf/mech/lyric) on YouTube. These are royalties exclusively allocated to composition rights holders. (cont'd)

2. (con'td) Between Art Tracks, sound recording claims, and monetized uploads (for unlicensed/non-claimed/unmanaged copyrights), recording artists have variety of ways to collect sound recording shares via distributors and MCNs.

To put 7 years of numbers into perspective, from the label/sound recording side: YouTube is less than 7% of our revenue. Spotify continues to lead the streaming wars.

i'm hoping at some point that you explain how a lot of what you mentioned is for *sound recordings* & is therefore not relevant to music compositions. e.g., i'm not sampling richaad. I just want to share revenue w/ toby for doing a separate cover of megan lovania.

It's for ... both; an entangled mess more jumbled than the source code for VVVVVV. (with love @/terrycavanagh) Due to the Indie Game Composer Exception, YouTube doesn't know first uses, so YouTube uses popular covers to find melodies in uploads, and matches those.

so, again, this is indirect. Are you saying that when YouTube matches composition for megalovania, it is not recognizing "Oh, this is toby fox's" but is saying "this is [the first guy who did a cover and submitted it to a disreputable distributor for content ID submission]"