3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,372
Load newest
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
The wealthy have money for a reason - they don’t spend it. Without free RATs we are all screwed 🤷‍♀️
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Cash for comment?? Everyone’s an expert…even though you weren’t around for the last pandemic! If that other 7% of the population chose vaccination we wouldn’t see large lots of imbeciles attending our hospitals with their self entitled tik tok beliefs. Darwin’s Law….mmmmmm
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1 @CrabbBrendan
Mary-Louise McLaws @MarylouiseMcla1
2 Jan 2022
4 of 3: Real leaders can be honest, here is what a real leader could say: case numbers & testing are important, COVID infects within minutes & travels more than 1.5m, long-covid is real & hospital numbers only part of story, gov can supply free RATs & better than PCR 3 days ago.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
It’s time to #CallAnElection so we can vote the #LNPDeathCult out #EnoughIsEnough
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Let them eat cake as Marie Antoinette said shortly before the revolution
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Only the wealthy and privileged will benefit ...... what a load of bullshit!
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
That’s the plan. Class warfare
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
I just wonder if any of the geniuses that are making this decisions, remember or know what happened in France in 1789.
1
2
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
There is the bottom line ......LNP don't want to support people who don't vote LNP.
5
25
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1 @deniseshrivell
Then they will demonise low socioeconomic communities for being the biggest spreaders, just like last time.
3
Load more