3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 路 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,372
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦馃憦
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
No one should buy RAT鈥檚, a very lge %age of ppl can鈥檛 afford the $ for avg family of 3-4 ppl, plus ups our Economy, number 1 focus of Premier than ppl NSW, he recklessly refused 4 wks Health Advice, risked no mask mandate & crowds, info UK, EU etc. clear. Now NSW & Aust 1/2
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
2/2: in World Headlines (not 4 good management) 4 smashing previous case records. Aust good 2yrs new Premier only 5wks cripple us & other States with uncontrollable spread, AGAINST HEALTH ADVICE. Medical Staff caring 4 ppl & kids, Deaths are past use USE BY DATE, so get PCRs free
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
You're full of shit. Just like the WHO.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Welcome back Mary-Louise 馃憦馃徏 馃憦馃徏
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
It鈥檚 going to be everywhere thanks to these lazy incompetents
Too late it鈥檚 spread, they want everyone to get it
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Thank god there is an election this year.
Is this how they intend to reign in the blow out of the NDIS? Asking for a friend.
2
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
It鈥檚 always about the wealthy people.
2