3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,378
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
You know you're cooked when everything becomes an argument for socialism. There is a stronger argument for giving everyone Panadol, even though it's still a stupid argument
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
And that's the intemtion by the look of it. The Prime Liar, Morrison, governs for the privileged. It's his religion, his politics and his raison d'être.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Love and positive thoughts 😍😍
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
They don't believe the average Australian is worthy of protecting.
We don’t need to bother with RAT. Just follow the advice. If your symptomatic or have been in direct close contact go and get a PCR test, wear masks and social distance. The vaccinations are free and everybody needs them. Forget all this stupid “you must get tested” from FB.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
And cook curry fish...
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
How else do reduce the number of labor voters?
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Frankly this current gov has failed us badly, they do NOT deserve to get my vote in the next election anymore…whether its at state or federal level… They could have win again by luck but I think this time they screw up big time…
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Thank you for telling it how it is .
1