3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,372
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
So for three days all the testing sites in my area has been closed except 1 which is the hospital which just closed. And domonic is telling us the infection rate is low. yes its low because no one can get TESTED.
2
3
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Always happy to pay for health, other ways to pay, don’t drink for a week, reduce smoking, eat at home, don’t buy clothes for a few months or even a year, go without unnecessary items. We all have to do at some time, health is a good reason.
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Health First and Stay Safe. Scott Morrison is no Leader, never was, never will be. It is all about "Let The Market Rule" such a scenario would not even enter his head. It is all about what he thinks is best for him.
1
4
15
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
I’m also kind of flabbergasted to note that govt makes a decision on people getting RAT tests while knowingly that RAT kits are difficult to obtain. Why there is no forethought? Shouldn’t the govt ensure the supply of RAT kits is adequate months before?
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Anyone can monitor symptoms. If you are asymptomatic you don't really need a test. So disappointing that people would make this a political issue. #Covid_19
1
1
I guess that’s part of Morrison’s master plan! Eugenics?
1
2
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
How do the privileged and wealthy protect themselves when they visit covid ridden shops, hospitals, dentists, schools and metro’s just like the rest of us. When covid is this widespread nobody can escape.
9
1
48
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Am convinced all this watering-down Govt. messaging significant number of ppl won't be bothered with buying RATs or getting tested at all. Positives in the community will be vastly under-counted.
4
7
65