3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,378
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
True. But what is the plan? Does the public know what they should do? Where/what are the priorities? Do we need reporting? Are there public health actions that will be guided by any metric?
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Nobody’s protected until EVERYONE is PROTECTED. Illness among those without means to isolate, test, vaccinate = ⬆️ risk for all We may face wave after wave after wave until we solve this as a collective…can we do it???
1
Enabling the #wealthy and #disabling the rest is central @LiberalAus #policy for everything. Playing out exactly with ‘Hardly Normal’ and the RAT sales. #auspol #PutLNPLast #EnoughisEnough
2
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
If $10 is expensive you need to have a good hard look at your self
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
If panic merchants like you didn't insist Australians travelling to other parts of Australia get covid tested, we wouldn't be in this mess.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
In a Pandemic 😷 with have seen very little of the Government health officer & minister & the LNP Nsw state health officer & the state minister, the Liberals know best 😷🤒 Mum is the word in their Governments
So will the Andrews government still be distributing them to Victorians or will we have to pay for them?
Already have a group of family & friends who have a few each and ready to share on a needs basis and send interstate as necessary.
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
So much talk of protecting people and reducing spread, why, when the goal is to live with COVID. The quicker we all get it the sooner it will be over and we can get on with life
1