3 of 3: Without (1) & not providing free RATs to households, only privileged & wealthy will be able to protect themselves & reduce wider risk of spread.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:28 PM UTC

198
1,149
62
5,378
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Many thanks for your input- sad the pollies aren’t listening
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Unspeakably nasty.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
The bunkum about living with these variants(more to come) crystallizes around our health systems, plans, resources-human and otherwise. All inadequate. A corrupt and incompetent Fed government aided by CHOs and media just walks away towards money and power.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Now come on Sco mo is allowing people to access super funds to purchase RAT! This is so morally wrong. Only rat is the person doing this. Once again horse has bolted!
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
No free lunch
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
We’re not privileged we’re scared u insensitive imbecile
1
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
We aren’t wealthy… we managed to buy some RATs…..
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Get ready for it, Scomo will come out with some reason why we don’t need these RATs. Remember late last year, he says “people, people get vaccinated”, all of a sudden he realises that there aren’t enough vaccines in Australia, so he comes out with “it’s not a race”.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
'Twas always the way.