1 of 3: When gov made changes to testing, I estimate 2 year cost may have reached $3.7bill for 54mill PCR tests (at possible 50% priv & pub path). To reduce $ test hubs could use PCR on those with symptoms & rapid antigen test (RATs) on all others. Cheaper but still effective.

Jan 1, 2022 · 10:27 PM UTC

63
624
34
2,485
Load newest
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Asymptomatic is basically 50% sensitivity on RATs, so not so great.
1
3
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Scotty from Marketing has failed again.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Okay, but where do we then find the money for invisible water, carparks and affluent rowing club upgrades?
1
3
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
How can us plebs invest in this scam and make maximum profits like your mates above ??
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Probably make more sense other way round. RAT has better accuracy in symptomatic patients and false negatives in non-symptomatic patients or if tested to early.
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
youtube.com/rZ_Z3ND1UVw
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
The plandemic is over: 99.8% recovery rate for Covid, same as the flu. 90%+ vaxed with an unsafe, ineffective, experimental ‘vax’ that has failed. Masks & lockdowns categorically shown to not work. Time to stop testing, fully open up & let people get on with life.
1