No. Those others have decades of safety evidence. C19 ‘vaccines’ dont. Evidence emerging of heart issues. Risk balance is tipping.

And what exactly is done for our Kids here? Aren't they our future? How is one not one worried about long Covid and complications. The sml percentage matters too!!

Have all medical staff now given up on the body's ability to naturally create anti-bodies? How many of those kids had illness more than cold or flu symptoms ? Any long term symptoms ? Can you put your hand on your heart and say no child will ever be harmed by the vaccine ?

Thanks. What’s your analysis of the safety data thus far?

Is that scientifically sound saying that? In contrast to earlier vaccines, Pfizer was tested on only 3,000 chln 5-11, & for only a period of wks! & Pfizer themselves said they wld not study incidence of myo/pericarditis in 5-11s 'til after the roll-out when seeking FDC approval.

These vaccines don’t prevent transmission or illness so your argument is flawed and baseless not to mention irresponsible

It’s not enough of a reason when the vast majority have minor illness and contribute to herd immunity after infection.

Agree. Vaccines safe lives. MMR vaccine prevent illness & spread. Risk/benefit not in question. What we have here, are not vaccines like the others. You can still spread & catch the disease. Unless child has pre existing conditions risks far outweitght any "benefits".

The vaccines you refer to do NOT cause thousands upon thousands of adverse reactions. This is the difference here. The lack of transparency in this area is the problem.

Primum non nocere. Those who are medical and experts in child health follow this - first do no harm. Let’s wait for safety data to ensure benefit is greater than risk, with hospitalization so low in children, we need to see the side effects in large numbers first