Gov plan must include rapid flexible response to COVID not 'live with it'. More detail required eg vaccination %. Need better transparency (modelling, remove 'cabinet in confidence'), apolitical communication, purpose-built quarantine, home quarantine protocol inc. home test kit.

Jul 2, 2021 · 10:56 AM UTC

136
844
53
3,056
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Don't understand complacency and retro approaches from this gov. If they can fully plan for and embrace dromology of potential military action, why not the wellbeing of the 'human capital' of their forces and the people they defend? It is all connected isn't it?
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Way too sensible. Couldn’t possibly be taken on board. By a PM who absolutely doesn’t want to be tied down by numbers and targets.
1
1
5
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Doherty institute is currently doing the modelling.
1
1
2
Where are the plans to include children's vaccinations?
2
1
12
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
You might have to run as an Indie in the next election. A good way to sort this out could be to get you on the crossbench with a few more real indies. Drive the decisions we need to be made.
2
6
54
Always pleased to see/hear an actual expert instead of churnalists and celebrities spruiking political division and nonsense. Thank you and the other lady (can't remember her name offhand) for the clear and forthright explanations. Be assured we are listening. And trusting.
1
1
10
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
Just love hearing from you Mary-Louise 💜. Shame the Feds don't listen!
Replying to @MarylouiseMcla1
And yet the live with it narrative is being pushed upon us. 😪
It wasn't a plan. It was 4 stages of talking points to take the sting out of Albanese's Press club address. On the other hand you could say he didn't want to look weak by cutting caps by 50%, so let's dress it as a plan.. and everything that was discussed you could say we knew.
1
5
1
39