Is this accounting for current physical and social distancing and use of personal protective measures in circumstances where distancing is not possible? Keeping the easy interventions on the longer term would help achieve zero transmission with lower population coverage.

Shove the vaccine up your culo

Genuine question. If current vaccines don't prevent transmission, rather prevent disease severity, how is it that we can even talk herd immunity? Are we talking about it in terms of reducing viral load? PS I am a big fan. Your love your media interviews, clear, calm & insightful

Combination, Pfizer, AZ plus any new improved vaccines, plus super fast DIY testing so you know you’ve got it before you go out in the community to golf ranges, pubs and a couple of kmarts

Is herd immunity even feasible given the experience in Manous, Brazil and the ever evolving mutations of the virus?

By not worrying about a virus no longer able to kill or hospitalise significant numbers?

Great interview on ABC this morning, thank you for your insights.

URGENT!! STEP UP!!

Suggest you read some of Gabriela Gomes' work. Also, are these new vaccines vaccines by definition? And are they safe? Saying they're safe doesn't make them safe. medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfi…

It doesn’t sound realistic that 80-90% of the population will vaccinate within a short period of time. HI is probably a phenomenon waiting to happen in the future sometime. Population statistics may help your analysis.