The FBI shouldn’t be able to spy on you without a warrant. How’s that controversial?

Dec 6, 2023 · 11:10 PM UTC

2,437
3,587
191
20,448
Load newest
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Free Assange
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Basic 4th Amendment requirement IMO
1
5
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The controversy is how it continues to happen without recourse or consequence.
1
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
@Jim_Jordan so you’re proposing a repeal of the patriot act, right?
13
17
232
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
It’s illegal
16
22
104
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Haven't you noticed? The institutions of the left are encroaching towards placing themselves above the law. Red flag: will reform be enough?
5
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. This is not to be violated NEVER
2
2
8
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
it’s not (shouldn’t be).
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Good words, now make it happen.
4
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
How many times have you reauthorized the patriot act?
3
8
1
67
Load more