But Facebook wanted to repair its relationship with the White House to avoid adverse action: “Given what is at stake here, it would also be a good idea if we could regroup and take stock of where we are in our relations with the [White House], and our internal methods too.”
49
1,334
24
7,852
This wasn’t the first time that the Biden White House was angry that Facebook didn’t censor more. According to these documents, the Biden White House demanded to know why Facebook had not censored a video from @TuckerCarlson. So, Facebook prepped its response.
50
1,514
22
8,245
To appease the Biden White House, talking points were drafted for Clegg. Facebook was ready to tell the White House that it had demoted a video posted by Tucker Carlson by 50% in response to the White House’s demands, even though the post didn’t violate any policies.
129
2,196
79
10,013
On August 2, 2021, Facebook admitted it was going to change its policies because of pressure from the Biden White House.
48
1,211
18
7,104
August 2, 2021: “[Facebook’s] Leadership asked Misinfo Policy . . . to brainstorm some additional policy levers we can pull to be more aggressive against . . . misinformation. This is stemming from the continued criticism of our approach from the [Biden] administration.”
28
1,132
19
6,678
But it wasn't just the White House. Facebook also changed its policies in direct response to pressure from Biden's Surgeon General, censoring members of the “disinformation dozen.”
64
1,426
38
7,140
These documents, AND OTHERS that were just produced to the Committee, prove that the Biden Admin abused its powers to coerce Facebook into censoring Americans, preventing free and open discourse on issues of critical public importance.
72
1,346
36
7,467
Only after the Committee announced its intention to hold Mark Zuckerberg in contempt did Facebook produce ANY internal documents to the Committee, including these documents, which PROVE that government pressure was directly responsible for censorship on Facebook.
95
1,533
40
7,848
Based on Facebook’s newfound commitment to fully cooperate with the Committee’s investigation, the Committee has decided to hold contempt in abeyance. For now. To be clear, contempt is still on the table and WILL be used if Facebook fails to cooperate in FULL.
276
1,367
49
8,509
To be continued…

Jul 27, 2023 · 4:03 PM UTC

575
832
32
7,862
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
👍 @threadreaderapp unroll please
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Turns out Andy Slavitt is a scumbag. Not really surprised.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
This makes #Facebook directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of American citizens
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Thank you for this! Now can we get to the impeachments already? Asking for me and my friends.
3
2
38
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
You don’t negotiate with terrorist and you charge and imprison those who violate our constitutional rights and freedoms. Why is this SO difficult for the committee to do? Words without action are empty and costing us a fortune and our future freedoms. Be the one to end the endless.
18
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
In September 2014, the Obama White House announced it was partnering with social media and media for the "Campus Rape" Title IX narrative. SurvJustice hired Wagatwe Wanjuki - a social media influencer. SurvJustice was tied to DoJ & DoE & WH to influence criminal trials & juries.
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Thank you Jim Jordan!