Can you imagine how different things would be if the “media” covered both sides fairly?

Dec 29, 2022 · 5:40 PM UTC

13,437
8,909
1,018
80,272
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Interesting that the MASSIVE topic of what the govt quietly refers2as,‘TARGETED INDIVIDUALS’ hasn't been widely brought up yet except by the Soros'funded NYT,who tried to discredit it:“United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers”-NYT,6-10-16
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Yeah, Fox would be so boring!
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
There shouldn't be sides when it comes to the media, they just need to REPORT THE NEWS, without bias.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Could you imagine how cool (for us) it would be for anyone in congress to talk about a legislative or prosecutorial accomplishment for the people instead of finger pointing?
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Imagine how different things would be if congress just followed the constitution...
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Do you listen to both sides? Could you cite examples of what you have heard and learned from the other side? Could you cite examples of policy changes because you and your colleagues have learned from the other side?
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
and the list to the Epstien Island lets get that list
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
If they would cover the Truth. Both sides are evil, and of their father lucifer who was a liar from the beginning and the father of it.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
“…ALL EXPERIENCE HATH SHEWN THAT MANKIND are more disposed to suffer… rather than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed…”   The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776