It’s the “right of the people to keep and bear Arms.” Not the “right of the people to keep and bear muskets.”

Jul 19, 2022 · 3:01 PM UTC

8,283
2,964
591
20,700
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
I guess you were too busy letting your students be abused to learn history. In 1789, the ONLY fire arms were muskets, flintlocks, & cannons. The drafters never envisioned high capacity mags, wad cutters, semi automatic & fully auto weapons capable of killing 625 people a minute.
1
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
That is not what the constitution says now is it. You people have construed the constitution to mean something it is not.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Where did you go to school? Trump University?
GIF
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The pro-life party making sure everyone understands guns are more important than human life.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
“The right to be shot randomly by lunatics in any public space” is a lousy right. It’s like the right to be exploited by corporations. You guys need to sort yourselves out in regards to how you store your machine guns! Ya can’t just leave ‘em lying around!!!
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The population was afforded the right to own arms to protect themselves from tyranny. That point is moot when you have nuclear weapons, fighter jets and tanks.
6
8
95
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Jesus does not agree that God gives American rights to a gun for self defense. Matthew 5 @CopelandNetwork @Paula_White will find God does not care about NDA's they use against Whistleblowers since he sees the true intentions. The Final Judge cannot be bribed.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
As usual, Gym again misses vital facts. - The right to keep & bear arms is limited. You can’t own/keep a machine gun or nuclear weapon for example. - Constitutional interpretation shows that “bear arms” was generally used to refer to military activity, not individual use.
6
12
63