Merrick Garland testified that the FBI wasn’t targeting parents. We now know the FBI is “tagging” parents they consider threatening. The Attorney General has some explaining to do. wsj.com/articles/fbi-tracks-…

Nov 16, 2021 · 8:13 PM UTC

763
1,746
127
5,684
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Stop this abuse of power.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The FEDS are LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE to track DOMESTIC TERRORISTS at every level. We can’t have VIGILANTISM take over our COMMUNITIES
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Because if someone is a threat they should be tagged. #duh
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Gym, people are threatening violence. This is illegal. Regardless of their parental state.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Jordan voted against infrastructure
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Since some of these protesters are threatening people it's only logical to assess how prevalent it is across the country and have a uniform name to file instances under. Since sine have been proven to be agitators and not even parents in districts, this seems appropriate.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Who has explaining to do?
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Yes, those parents that have been harrsing and threatening teachers and school board members.
2