It’s not a “bipartisan infrastructure bill.” It’s socialism.

Oct 4, 2021 · 8:26 PM UTC

2,164
6,459
292
31,854
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
I wish!
2
1
3
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
It doesn't authorize govt. to control the means of production, which is literally the definition of socialism. You should know this.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
When have you ever been bipartisan?
3
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
In a way, yes, infrastructure is socialism. Modern socialism is when the government gives back to the tax payers with things like infrastructure.
21
4
47
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Why don’t you want to invest in America’s infrastructure, Gym?
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
All about power and control “"What we've said from the beginning is that it's never been about the price tag. It's about what we want to deliver," Jayapal said. "The critical thing is let's get our priorities in and then we will figure out the actual cost."”
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Novel idea. Why don’t we only spend what we have $$$ for… if new spending, then need to get rid of old/outdated spending. A balance budget…
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ Republicans: The party of tax cuts for the rich. Republicans added $7 trillion to the national debt under Trump.
2
8
1
23