Justice Clarence Thomas on election integrity: “We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections.”
1,486
7,104
311
29,396
Justice Clarence Thomas on election integrity (cont.): “The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

Feb 23, 2021 · 10:14 PM UTC

539
2,598
104
12,509
Load newest
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The judicial branch does not provide rules for elections. Rules/laws are made by legislation and evaluated for constitutionality by the courts, not the other way around. That being said, state legislatures are not supreme in election matters. Cannot ignore the the people/courts.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Hey jim jordan i just watched you on stinchfield . I heard a lot of talk about HR1 but i never heard you say what you or y'all are going to do about it!!!!????!!!!
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
I bet the Justice would report a crime if he saw one,.,,
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
So good.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
So, no more gerrymandering 🤔
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Give up Gym. It was investigated. They found nothing.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
It was a landslide! Lies lies lies! Ohio State
Load more