Big Tech claims they aren’t biased against Conservatives. So why are they suppressing speech to help the Democrats? Section 230!

Oct 14, 2020 · 7:30 PM UTC

2,395
8,930
456
30,953
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Because we are not willing to hand over our democracy to Russia.
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Putin throwing in towel. Look into condo in kingdom, I think you may be moving.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
I'm living proof of this! They disabled my account over a cartoon of Kyle Rittenhouse.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Shut down All of them
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Russian disinformation doesn't qualify as "speech"
3
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Section 230 is a piece of Internet legislation in the US passed into law as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, formally codified as Section 230 of the Communications Act. #DECENCY Why is it not surprising that you would be against decency? #FuckingGerrymandering
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Since when is Russian disinformation considered free speech?
3
4
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Did you see how the background of the "emails" and the VP logo didn't blend together like they would naturally in real emails? A PDF of emails with a clear forgery up top is what you're standing for. There's a flat side on the icon which isn't how Gmail's icons look at all.
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
The government should not be allowed to force a tech company to allow content it does not want there. Twitter and Facebook have that right, they own their service. You accept their terms of service when you sign up. Its not like they deleted it from the internet anyways.
4
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Propaganda should never be equated with "free speech."
1