Confirming judges isn’t the same as court packing. It’s not that hard to understand. Unless you’re a Democrat.

Oct 11, 2020 · 4:53 PM UTC

3,101
12,241
637
52,801
Load newest
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Not protecting young men, is not the same as protecting young men. #GymJordan
2
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Not holding appt hearings on over 50 Fed Justices & a Scotus justice to carry them over to next Admin IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF COURT PACKING! STOP LYING AND MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS
6
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
No, they understand just fine. It's their integrity that's at issue. Their mostly young constituency may not understand, but the characters making the claim do.
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan @Oscaretta
This is the new talking point lie, and they know it. They want the uninformed to think it is so.
2
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Since we're talking courts... How's about this tidbit? npr.org/2016/11/03/500560120…
11
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
And it's not hard to understand McConnell either!
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Jim, what difficult is how you just overlook the #CorruptGOP and how they’ve slammed through all those unqualified conservative judges over the last 3+ years. That’s what’s called packing the court. Stop projecting and deflecting. Joe hasn’t done anything with the courts.
4
Replying to @Jim_Jordan @BIG_AL_08
They understand. But gaslighting is their go-to tactic.
1
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
This is a lie
1
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
how is it possible that you make less sense than the day before...
1