Democrats are engaged in presidential obstruction. They're so desperate to stop the President that they won't help the country. The President's had enough! Can't blame him. (1/7)
7,812
9,789
1,032
41,489
Congress has a legitimate constitutional role to conduct oversight of the executive branch. But that's not what the Democrats are doing. They're digging into the President's personal life from BEFORE he was a candidate. There can only be one reason to do this: POLITICS. (2/7)

May 24, 2019 · 1:03 PM UTC

701
1,480
84
5,071
Republicans conducted serious oversight on abuses of gov't power by the Obama-Biden administration: -IRS targeting conservatives -Fast & Furious gun-running -Solyndra and other green companies wasting taxpayer dollars -Benghazi tragedy -FBI/DOJ targeting Trump campaign (3/7)
503
1,477
77
4,889
Compare that to what the Democrats are doing. They're going after: -The President's PERSONAL tax returns -The President's PERSONAL finances -The President's PERSONAL business records It has nothing to do with oversight of the executive branch. (4/7)
797
1,612
99
5,295
Remember, the first thing that @RepCummings did after taking control of the Oversight Committee was to change its name from "Committee on Oversight and GOVERNMENT Reform" to "Committee on Oversight and Reform." They don't think their oversight should focus on government! (5/7)
299
1,353
48
4,590
The Democrats are so focused on taking down the President that they have secret Memorandums of Understanding to coordinate their partisan investigations. We've asked them to release those MOUs to the public, but they won't do it. (6/7)
700
2,949
155
10,321
We could work together on the big problems facing America. We could solve the border crisis, lower the cost of prescription drugs, fix our broken budget, and come to an agreement on infrastructure. But Democrats are more interested in stopping President Trump. (7/7)
4,511
5,735
477
25,277
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
No, this is not the only reason to look into his financial history. They are trying to understand his inexplicable support for murderous and autocratic regimes. Could he be financially beholden? A money launderer? If there is nothing to hide, let's put it behind us.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Actually, it is imperative that they do to determine whether he has been compromised by Russians. I don't hear you EVER condemning Russia for interfering in our elections. I don't hear you EVER condemn Trump for siding with known dictators who have violated human rights.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
So, by your logic, if someone breaks the law in order to get into office, there's no oversight role in looking into that? It would fall under one's "personal life before being a candidate"? Also, remind me: when was Whitewater, vis-a-vis Clinton's terms in office? 🤔
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
This isn’t true.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Clearly the dems have weaponized their Governmental powers to attack the President for political purposes. This is abuse of power and borders on sedition. It is a flagrant misuse of taxpayers money.
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Or, President Trump has a long history of crooked business deals and tax-cheating, and he SHOULD be investigated. 🙄
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
So if nothing comes out, then all good, you win, but if he was a piece of shit, you are too
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
Maybe your a little dense but Trump may be comprised financially
Replying to @Jim_Jordan
It's all related, Gym. Because of his desperate need for money, he was looked at and could be compromised and bribed by a foreign adversary. The math on this is not hard