"While international conservation scientists were holding a considered debate on trophy hunting – with all the pros and cons – rabid activists were digging up imaginary dirt on them," writes Gail Potgieter dailymaverick.co.za/opinioni…

It’s for exactly these reasons that the @ipbes #sustainableuse assessment authors are chosen for objectivity and never paid for their contributions. Hunting is just one of the many themes being carefully unpacked by @ipbes

I understand the principle. The problem with not paying scientists for reviews& assessments is that some scientists - especially in the Global South - do not have the funds, time and institutional support to take off time from their busy schedules. Privileges the privileged...

Which is exactly why IPBES offers travel and subsistence support to experts from developing countries participating in the IPBES work programme - granted it does not entirely address this challenge but it does help to somewhat ameliorate it.

Out of interest: what is the balance percentage-wise on your last reports? Global North versus Global South scientists?

Also speaking for myself- researcher without tenure in South Africa - I would not be able to meet my financial obligations on travel costs and S&T. Who pays for my time? How do I pay for my life back home including family obligations? And I’m privileged in the bigger scheme.