Today, I introduced a bill prohibiting the Fed from issuing a central bank digital currency directly to individuals. Here’s why it matters:
941
4,437
969
17,518
As other countries, like China, develop CBDCs that fundamentally omit the benefits and protections of cash, it is more important than ever to ensure the United States’ digital currency policy protects financial privacy, maintains the dollar’s dominance, and cultivates innovation.
21
205
23
2,501
CBDCs that fail to adhere to these three basic principles could enable an entity like the Federal Reserve to mobilize itself into a retail bank, collect personally identifiable information on users, and track their transactions indefinitely.
20
163
13
2,290
Not only does this CBDC model raise “single point of failure” issues, leaving Americans’ financial information vulnerable to attack, but it could be used as a surveillance tool that Americans should never be forced to tolerate from their own government.
25
216
16
2,670
Requiring users to open an account at the Fed to access a United States CBDC would put the Fed on an insidious path akin to China’s digital authoritarianism.
25
235
17
2,665
Any CBDC implemented by the Fed must be open, permissionless, and private. This means that any digital dollar must be accessible to all, transact on a blockchain that is transparent to all, and maintain the privacy elements of cash.
94
341
88
2,958
In order to maintain the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency in a digital age, it is important that the United States lead with a posture that prioritizes innovation and does not aim to compete with the private sector.
34
195
16
2,342
Simply put, we must prioritize blockchain technology with American characteristics, rather than mimic China’s digital authoritarianism out of fear.

Jan 12, 2022 · 3:23 PM UTC

160
465
82
4,185
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
“…with American characteristics,” <— A subtle, clever, very entertaining reference to our global competitor. 🙂
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
Agree on all points. However, this legislation excludes them from doing it w ‘individuals’. Doesn’t mean they can’t issue to banks or companies who then create the account w the individual?
We need btc to be controlled by 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 we cannot let other countries gain ground! It would be like ceding the internet to foreign countries! We must be proactive sir 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
Sounds pretty based, not gonna lie! 😎
1
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
The US will fall behind China unless the government allows private companies like #Ripple to flourish in America and promote crypto innovation
9
17
116
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
Tom, how about we declare Bitcoin legal tender, and let it all play out. We would be ahead of the curve then.
1
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
Shouldn't we aim to get rid of the non government agency that prints our money?
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
Solid principles @RepTomEmmer. 👏 Why not consider, as a first step, a GSE, where the USG partners with a US based enterprise like @circlepay to serve as a pilot program for some level? At arm's length, the USG can learn more about the digital financial evolution?
Replying to @GOPMajorityWhip
We’ll shit bro 😎