nitter
Design Week
@Design_Week
1 Oct 2013
As Thomas Cook rebrands on the cheap, we ask: why are big brands so keen to skimp on design?
bit.ly/1hhH7OI
Oct 1, 2013 · 12:09 PM UTC
9
16
4
Tom Actman
@TomActman
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
— Because every single one of us (the public) moans about how much money is wasted on a badge. There's no happy medium.
3
Design Week
@Design_Week
1 Oct 2013
@TomActman
True, and think that companies (and the public) seeing it as just a 'badge' is one of the main problems.
CJ
@SuburbanGoku
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
They only tweaked a design that was created by a studio in Sweden. Not completely 'in-house'.
Nicola Marklew
@lengnicola
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
But what is 'cheap' design? In house peeps should be jst as good as agency creatives surely,so is it really skimping on design?
Bond and Coyne
@BondandCoyne
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
Design agencies don't communicate the value of effective design, marketing managers are looking for measurables not ad talk
1
Ayomo
@ayomo_creative
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
On the cheap will not get the ambitious where they want to be!
1
zuna creative
@zunacreative
3 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
too many cooks and in-house creatives 'advice' on what really would work not being taken on board.
Ave Design
@AveDesignStudio
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
I think there are too many stakeholders involved who don't understand the value branding and strategy can add
1
1
Jamie Solomon
@Jamie_SoIomon
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
that's funny, I remember working on developing the innovative love/heart idea whilst at a large branding consultancy!
1
Jamie Solomon
@Jamie_SoIomon
1 Oct 2013
Replying to
@Design_Week
@Design_Week
must have been to must jargon or maybe they spent to much of their budget in getting external advice