Replying to @vriskahimejoshi
Uhh this is just the Mastodon Twitter crossposter, it translates the topic from the posts on that website as "CW: topic"
1
2
i saw a content warning for the letter "b" and just assumed bs
1
1
even if it was a manual cw, it is informing you about its content isn't it? Cws are very different to tws
2
2
tru, i dont really know the diff between cws and tws that much
1
2
No problem!! Just in case, A trigger warning is meant for the tweet to not be shown to people with the trigger (that's why you mute words) A content warning usually describes the content and if it's something you don't wanna read, you move on (Mastodon has a "read more")
1
2
But why wouldn't someone want to read the letter b? Especially when the letter is used so commonly in English. Again, people who don't understand will see this which will feed the fire of not taking content warnings seriously.
2
3
i mean if you're not interested in reading smth with the topic being the letter b ig it would make sense (not totally sure tho)
2
You're reading too much into it, it's just how the crossposter formats the topic
2
Replying to @CochuU_ @_Cochu
Then it's the crossposter's fault. In my opinion the crossposter shouldn't be using CW's like that if they mean an entirely different thing?

May 18, 2021 路 4:09 PM UTC

3
Replying to @CiblesGD
It describes the content there's nothing more than that
1
That sounds like a nice concept, but it's still titled, "content warning", when there isn't content to warn about? Still a little confused, but shouldn't it be titled something else if it isn't worthy of what people use content warnings for?
1
Replying to @CiblesGD @_Cochu
i mean it says "read more" instead of "cw" accorfding to cochu so i see how that could be interpreted differently (like i initially did)
2
Well yea, but the problem lies when it goes over to twitter and is titled, "CW", when that typically is used for other serious topics, not a singular letter of the alphabet.
1